Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court regarding campaign finance laws, in which the Court found that laws restricting the …

Federal Election Commission that held that corporations could be banned from making electioneering communications. The Court upheld the reporting and disclaimer requirements for independent …

Dec 9, 2025 · Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on January 21, 2010, ruled that laws preventing corporations and unions from using general treasury …

Sep 9, 2009 · Citizens United argued that: 1) Section 203 violates the First Amendment on its face and when applied to The Movie and its related advertisements, and that 2) Sections 201 and 203 are also …

Summary Citizens United, a nonprofit corporation that advocated in various ways against Hillary Clinton in the 2008 presidential primary, argued that a federal law’s bans on independent political advertising …

Federal Election Commission. In a 5-4 ruling, the Court struck down federal limits on what organizations (including non-profit organizations, unions, and for-profit corporations) may say during elections.

Dec 12, 2019 · The Supreme Court’s 2010 ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is a controversial decision that reversed century-old campaign finance restrictions and enabled …

Mar 26, 2018 · In Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission (FEC), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2010 that political spending is a form of free speech that’s protected under the First Amendment.

Feb 22, 2024 · In 2010, the United States Supreme Court made a landmark decision in the Citizens United v. FEC case. The court ruled that corporations and unions have the same right as individuals …

Citizens United, which released a documentary film critical of Senator Hillary Clinton as a presidential candidate, challenged the constitutionality of this provision of the BRCA.